Guy Bedford
Guy Bedford
While the motivation for source phase imports remains that it is considered the more useful route for the instantiation of WebAssembly modules, this does not negate the need for or...
Thanks @nicolo-ribaudo for bringing up this extra validation step - as we discussed, I've added a refactoring in https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10380/commits/da7425ed678648d18dc17ad517e5410ac98868d4 to move the validation into HostLoadImportedModule so that source phase imports...
@syg thanks for your summary here, that sounds like a good outline to me. With regards to: > Given the points (5) and (6) above, I'd prefer the informative note...
@domenic nits all look good to me. I do have a slight preference for `Module Record` over `Cyclic Module Record` terminology, but being clear works just as good. I've updated...
Sure, I've pushed a commit to update the ESM integration reference to be the spec repo instead of the spec document, and set the title as the direct proposal's name.
Okay, reverted the last commit and it seems the exceptions proposal did similar here previously in altering the title to include the proposal name. I've landed the title update in...
@domenic the title on the spec is now updated, so we should finally be there now.
This should also reintroduce the `"fetch/api/response/response-headers-guard.any.js"` WPT test.
This can be done as a minor since there is no functional change, so long as it rebased in a way that respects the Candidate Response phase of the Response...
Landed in https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/f5ac35ee156481088136fa39a4ceffe59850c326.