Guy Bedford

Sorry for the long delay on this one, I've finally been able to come back to this. I'm working on the RollupJS support at the moment and will include a...

> Is the idea that together with https://github.com/WebAssembly/esm-integration/pull/116 I'd be able to do wasm-js:phase/source?foo=bar? Exactly, with this design both proposals could be used in conjunction with eachother in this way,...

Yes, just manually add a new line noting the change. The tests also need to be updated here via `just test-ui-overwrite`. There also seems to be an issue with the...

Seems there is also `just test-ui-overwrite` to run here as well.

> I already did this one [ada1037](https://github.com/wasm-bindgen/wasm-bindgen/pull/4795/commits/ada10376611c161ba1cbef6893988e64129b06bc), not really sure if its correctly. This is MacOs / Linux / toolchain differences, I think down to spacing. We likely have a...

I'm not sure how I feel about this - is it not possible to define a start function that simply calls the other start functions? What inhibits doing this at...

Please just update here when ready for review.

@RReverser the reason for splitting this out is that box types allow flexible import type generics when we don't have any other option, but because the boxed generic is now...

The counter argument effectively being that this is just an externref box with type information just because `JsRef` exists doesn't mean every `T` is a `JsRef`, and doesn't mean `JsRef`...

To give some more context here as to why `Promise` is hard for primitive types is because there is no `IntoWasmAbi` and `FromWasmAbi` concrete trait implementation that works for all...