Guillaume Valadon

Results 152 comments of Guillaume Valadon

Looks like a good idea for the last byte. Other bytes such as ("192.168.0.28", "192.168.16.64") might be 1 but trick to implement or understand.

@jingfeihu it looks like some tests are failing. I converted your PR to a draft. Feel free to modify it when it is ready.

Thanks for your interest in Scapy. Could you share an example that triggers the issue? For example by adding a pcap file to a github comment.

Could you share an example that triggers the issue that your are aiming to fix? That will allow us to understand your PR.

Thanks for your explanation. Could you add a unit test based on your example at https://github.com/secdev/scapy/blob/master/test/scapy/layers/inet6.uts#L1817 ?

That’s indeed a bug. Do you feel like submitting a PR?Sent from my iPhoneOn 28 Jun 2023, at 07:38, Matt Bolognani ***@***.***> wrote: Brief description The tun interfaces on my...

Thanks for your interest in the project. Could you share a single Scapy packet that reproduces this behavior, along with the expected correct packet?

Thanks for this PR. I will give it a try. In the meantine, could you fix the PEP-08 issues https://github.com/secdev/scapy/actions/runs/5920584081/job/16053137679?pr=4100#step:5:1 ?

Thanks for the report. I believe that no one really used this code to build a packet, does this patch works for your use case? ``` diff --git a/scapy/contrib/stun.py b/scapy/contrib/stun.py...