Anton Grübel

hey @enzowritescode thanks for reaching out. If I see it correctly, then you use `pypy`, which we don't officially support. just use a normal Python version, then it should work...

hey @ArturFortunato thanks for reaching out. We currently don't support `for_each` on resource and module level, but are currently in the planning phase, so look out in the coming weeks...

thanks for adding the extra info, it should be enough to reconstruct the problem 😄

hey @ScottKinder thanks for reaching out. yeah, it looks like we are not considering skip annotations for our graph checks (CKV2_K8S_x). I will see what I can do about it...

hey @nicholas-marchini thanks for reaching out. It looks like the inconsistency comes from the massive usage of the same module `rds` not so surprising for me. Additionally using multiple tfvars...

hey @nmarchini Do you have the same setup, multiple times using the same module? If yes, how many times is it?

hey @Veereshsetty thanks for reaching out. As I can see from your output the specific fields we check are marked as `(known after apply)` and this is something we don't...

ok, I think I understand better what is the actual issue. `azurerm_network_interface_security_group_association.association` is then referenced in the `azurerm_subnet` resources, right? If yes, then the reason it fails, we currently don't...

hey @acelebanski support for `try` was added via #6043, so there is a chance it works now, but of course there can be other factors making it still fail.

hey @arkaprava-jana thanks for reaching out. This is known limitation, which we don't plan on tackling any time soon. Can't find the issue number, where it was already mentioned in...