grhkm21
grhkm21
FYI (again) #40070 is ready for review
Only the final commit (36th) is from this PR, the rest is from #8612.
Because that one is tagged maintainer-merge so I thought I shouldn't touch it. Oh also the actual dependency part is I also refactor `add_pow_eq_add_pow_mod_mul_pow_add_pow_div`, if that's what you're asking
```sage sage: K = GF(2^61 - 1) sage: d = discrete_log(K(1), K(3), bounds=(1,2^30), algorithm="lambda", operation="*") sage: d
Actually I'm more in favour of treating `GF(p, n, ...)` as `GF((p, n), ...)`.
Here's a simple example that I use locally: https://gist.github.com/grhkm21/6d20ddd7f11b3c00f889349052a43947, as a "sanity check" before CI shouts at me
Hi, I just found out about this issue as well. FYI I believe Hensel lifting is already implemented when you solve equations over Qp or Zp, so I *think* a...
Hi, if this PR needs help, either with linting (I guess I'm more familiar than bodnalev), or with reviewing, please ping me! It seems like a big PR but I...
I'm pretty sure the "merging 'develop' to this branch" action caused the linter to fail... this is very weird. I will fix it.
Not sure what you are talking about.