grhkm21
grhkm21
I think this PR is not the correct way to implement the feature I want (sum of morphisms of *abelian varieties*), since of course you can't just add two arbitrary...
Thanks for the response, the idea is that someone else should be able to reproduce the autogenerated headers on their machine too, and since e.g. for v3.0.1 a commit different...
Sorry there’s a small linting issue, I will fix it when I get back. @grhkm21
Not sure why it got triggered, but the fix from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30454549/a-literal-in-restructuredtext works. I assume this is still a positive review, feel free to revert if you disagree with the one-char...
One small change, then it should be fine.
@hadipourh Have you read what I wrote?
Sorry for the late reply. Your added `TESTS` session doesn't test for the issue fixed by this PR. As you said, this PR addresses when the SBox's input_size and output_size...
After fixing the test output this should be ready :)
I took a look at your sboxanalyzer project, it looks interesting and would be great to have in Sage. Is the entire `espresso` folder also part of the project? I...
Please do not rebase PRs after they are positively reviewed... It retriggers CI and requires a re-review (automated by bot, as you can see) etc.