grandizzy
grandizzy
> I thought this would not be the default behavior as a user must add some configs to their foundry.toml to enable it @0xalpharush ah, do you mean we should...
### Regression tests #### https://github.com/grandizzy/fuzz-benchmarks - no regression in breaking invariants - `SimpleDSChiefTest` can be caught faster with coverage guided fuzzing (as it requires same sequence mutated to break it,...
@0xalpharush @DaniPopes please see above https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/pull/10190#issuecomment-2980012506 Couple of things noticed while performing tests: - No regression introduced, using defaults (coverage guided disabled) the invariant tests behave as in previous versions...
yep, agree, @DaniPopes good to send?
@developeruche would you still be on to drive this PR to the finish line? thank you!
> Hi [@StErMi](https://github.com/StErMi) thanks for your suggestion > > In my opinion this is out of scope for Foundry and I'm hesitant to implement a tool that has the ability...
I think going forward the test structure and such updates could be simplified a lot with https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/issues/8564 that is allowing inline evm config version.
thank you, makes sense, should be nicely handled with solar
can be coupled with https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/issues/9519 by checking hashes of existing binaries
yep, running release workflow from the branch won't replace nightly but build a new release with branch name so should be safe to test