Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
@nicoweidner The schema is actually generated from the [OWL Ontology](https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/blob/development/v2.3.1/ontology/spdx-ontology.owl.ttl) using the [Schema converter utility](https://github.com/spdx/tools-java/blob/master/src/main/java/org/spdx/tools/schema/OwlToJsonSchema.java). The utility converts any property with a cardinality allowing more than 1 to plural. In...
Setting a 3.0 Milestone and opening a parallel issue for the schema generator utility: https://github.com/spdx/tools-java/issues/92
In 3.0 we decided to only use the singular form (even if the cardinality is more than one). Closing this issue.
Thanks @maxhbr for the quick analysis and PR. You'll find some related PR's where we've tried to fix similar issues - perhaps one of those PR's caused this issue?
From a quick check - it looks like this has been resolved
Sorry about the late response to this issue. The SPDX spec document tag/value. There is a well understood issue where the JSON format is not adequately documented in the spec....
Closing this as resolved
@maxhbr Good point - we should not change the type for the fallback IMO. I agree with your proposed solution.
This field has been removed in SPDX 3.0 - closing as not planned
> I think this is saying that you have to provide a SHA1 checksum, but you can provide any number (including none) of other checksums. I believe this was the...