Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
If this hasn't been fixed already, it will be resolved in SPDX 3.0 - closing
This is likely an issue in the SPDX Java Library - transferring...
Since this is a non-breaking change, moving to 3.1
> I don't see SHA256 mentioned anywhere in the file. Is it supposed to show up? Currently, only SHA1 is written since the SPDX requires SHA1 and SHA256 is optional....
> given we aren't using this tool b/c we never implemented this option in the SPDX spec, I'm not sure this is worth your time to work on at this...
This may be a good topic for the [operations profile team](https://github.com/spdx/meetings/tree/main/operations). Moving to 3.1 milestone.
> @goneall Is there a better RDF file we can use for tests? The current one - https://github.com/spdx/spdx-online-tools/blob/main/src/examples/SPDXRdfExample-v2.0.rdf - raise issues like `'org.spdx.library.model.SpdxIdInUseException: Can not create Apache-2.0. It is already...
@Moullisha - We are switching over to a new version of the utility https://github.com/spdx/tools-java and the library https://github.com/spdx/spdx-java-library Could you check and see if the same issue is in the...
@sschuberth - I don't have a specific date, but there is a prototype under development. Now that the heavy lifting is done on the spec, I'll shift my focus to...
@swinslow - This is a field we've used to capture the HTML representation of the license. We didn't capture this in the SPDX 3.0 expanded licensing properties. Moving this to...