Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
ping @kestewart
moving to 3.1 as it is not a breaking change
This may be a good issue to add to the [operations](https://github.com/spdx/meetings/tree/main/operations) profile team.
Moving to 3.1 - the target for the profiles team.
Moving to 3.1 for consideration. cc: @swinslow
I ~~think~~ this is a non-breaking change, so I'm moving it to 3.1. @kestewart - let me know if you think this may lead to a breaking change.
@kestewart - We may have some other contributors we missed - we'll add suggestions to this pull request (from the tech call on 16 April)
10+ days after initial review, going ahead and merging
Just for reference, this was an Google Summer of Code project to perform a similar function. It is no longer being maintained and is archived here: https://github.com/spdx/license-coverage-grader
> should we drop RDF then? I would definitely prioritize JSON ahead of RDF, but I don't see a reason to drop RDF as a format since it is already...