Gary O'Neall

Results 1059 comments of Gary O'Neall

moving to 3.1 as it is not a breaking change

This may be a good issue to add to the [operations](https://github.com/spdx/meetings/tree/main/operations) profile team.

Moving to 3.1 - the target for the profiles team.

Moving to 3.1 for consideration. cc: @swinslow

I ~~think~~ this is a non-breaking change, so I'm moving it to 3.1. @kestewart - let me know if you think this may lead to a breaking change.

@kestewart - We may have some other contributors we missed - we'll add suggestions to this pull request (from the tech call on 16 April)

10+ days after initial review, going ahead and merging

Just for reference, this was an Google Summer of Code project to perform a similar function. It is no longer being maintained and is archived here: https://github.com/spdx/license-coverage-grader

> should we drop RDF then? I would definitely prioritize JSON ahead of RDF, but I don't see a reason to drop RDF as a format since it is already...