Gunnar Liljas

Unfortunately, that is not a viable solution. Compilation issues aside, the Nuget package needs the dependency to NH5. I suggest dropping support for NH4. The existing package is stable and...

It needs the dependency or an assembly redirect, since it doesn't actually implement the new ICache interface (it should work, though, thanks to "virtual"). It's not super kosher, but quite...

It works and is functional. It's your prerogative to decide whether the implementation is the right route to take. I'm just saying that it's a bit of a hacky way...

Thanks for replying. I will give it a bit of cleanup and an attempt to support NH

How would you like to handle the backwards compatibility? A separate Async package with >=5 dependency and changing the dependency of the standard package to

I don't see how, or am I missing something? Or are you thinking of having a package version 5 (or 4) with a NH5 dependency, while still being able to...

The "standard" caches were just upgraded https://www.nuget.org/packages/NHibernate.Caches.SysCache/5.1.0 ..and they've chosen to just up the dependency. I suggest the same for this library.

I'd like to stress the importance of this. Including RequireJS in your project shouldn't have to mean that you surrender completely to the Require way. Sure, adding things to the...

I respectfully disagree. Not only because it turns the extensibility API into a convoluted mess, not aligned with the documentation on how to write binding handlers, components etc, but also...

Sorry for necroposting, but I just wanted to add that Sendgrid does NOT support SMTPUTF8.