gkokolatos

@DimCitus Thank you for your comments and review so far. As you can see, there have been a few commits that should address some of the minor and easy to...

@DimCitus thank you for your reviewing efforts. Please find some updates based on comments and off list discussions. If there are any existing comments that can be resolved, I would...

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 3, 2020 1:14 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Hi [@gkokolatos](https://github.com/gkokolatos) ; thanks for this PR and very detailed architecture presentation! Thank you for...

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 3, 2020 2:52 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: >>> - [supervisor] I think we are missing a notion of static/dynamic services. The services that...

@DimCitus Hey, I started working on the two things we agreed upon, namely introducing dynamic services and introducing a [services] section in the keeper configuration. Both are great tasks and...

A commit was added to address most of the comments received. Please refer to [commit](https://github.com/citusdata/pg_auto_failover/pull/539/commits/bb5298b8617305cde5c5551e2327e0650d6f4c00) for details. Here I wish to outline that now: Enable/disable is gone in favour of...

@DimCitus Hi and a happy new year! Anything I can do to help the review of the current PR?

Hi @dimitri maybe #1013 can be of use to address the minor issues of failing tests for postgres 16.

Hi @dimitri, Please see #1015 which should address the CI testing.

> Hey @gkokolatos how do you feel about preparing the next pg_auto_failover release, version 2.1 with Postgres 16 support? I can pick it up. Thank you