Giovanni Barillari
Giovanni Barillari
> @gi0baro all the other issues are fixed now the major issue is socketify web not able to figure out what the issue is. You might want to ping @cirospaciari...
@Kludex I just rebased from current master for your convenience
@Kludex what's your current take on this? Should I rebase so it can be merged, or should we just forget about it?
@Kludex not sure why the coverage fails after the last rebase..
@Kludex sorry for the long delay. This is now rebased on latest master, and tests/CI is finally green. Let me know if any additional edits are required for merge.
Given at the moment Granian is the only server implementation of RSGI, the spec and Granian code are quite tightened. Granian doesn't support any async implementation other than `asyncio`, as...
> It seems to me that coupling a server specification to a backing async implementation so tightly will 100% mean a (heavily) breaking change in the future That's not necessarily...
Closing as stale
I might understand the frustration, but at the same time if you need that scale level you shouldn't really keep the state into a Python dictionary or whatever struct in...
On the backward compatibility thing, I personally think is fine to add new features on top of an existing extension, given there's a way for the application to understand if...