Geraint

I think an options parameter seems best to me. :) Out of curiosity, why do you sometimes not want type-conversion? (I can understand not filling in required properties.)

Sorry for being silent for so long. I don't actively do any PHP development any more, so I wasn't really set up for it. Is there still demand for this?...

If the transformation matrix is doing non-integer scaling, then yes, your bitmap's location might land on a non-integer co-ordinate. I didn't see a visual difference when I changed it, except...

I think it's a good idea. A simple implementation runs into trouble if `required` is not directly next to the appropriate `properties` entry (e.g. if your property definitions are inside...

I've been calling this "schema assignment". I opened #140 a while ago, but I've only recently heard any interest in it. I hope to find some time to put this...

The obvious way to do this would be for tv4 to abstract the property/item access such that it can use either `obj[key]` or `obj.get(key)` depending on some flag. However, this...

Sorry for the delay. I like this, but it may represent a subtle change in behaviour. I'm trying to figure out whether it will screw up anybody's existing validation. The...

In a normal validation scenario, the data is not modified. Therefore, if a required property isn't present then validation fails. You seem to be talking about "coercive validation", where the...

For non-coercive validation? None, it's informative only, much like "title" or "description". If you want coercive validation, I started a project `tv4-coerce`. It hasn't generated much interest yet, but if...

Thanks for the bug (as well as the very helpful diagnosis!). I'm pretty busy right now, but I'll try and get a fix to you by the end of Friday...