Gary Gregory
Gary Gregory
This will break source compatibility though.
IMO I'm not sure it's worth mentioning because this is actually a Java feature and can you can say that any method is 'not type-safe' if it is declared in...
> Isn't there a mechanism we can hook into to take a snapshot of existing properties before and restoring them after a test method? Yes, there's an app for that...
> The issue is that currently some tests are still using JUnit 4. For that there is the [System Rules](https://github.com/stefanbirkner/system-rules) project, but I did not want to add two separate...
> Each test class in core runs in an isolated fork, otherwise we couldn’t test different values of properties which are stored into static final fields (e.g. Constants.java) I do...
> > The issue is that currently some tests are still using JUnit 4. For that there is the [System Rules](https://github.com/stefanbirkner/system-rules) project, but I did not want to add two...
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:02 AM Remko Popma wrote: > I did not have time to do an in-depth review today, would need to take > another detailed...
> After do some debugging, i found out that there are some part of the code that is missing in MongoDb4Provider class when creating log4j-mongodb4 module, knowing that this part...
> Hi team, > Please have take a look to the new test case that i submitted. In that test, i choose to use real MongoDB server instead of the...
Hi @Kenducky Thank you for your PR. You'll want to look at the branch 'release-2.x', that where the 2.x releases originate while the branch 'master' is for future 3.0 work.