Francisco de la Peña

Results 95 comments of Francisco de la Peña

The EM features in HyperSpy keep on growing at an amazing rate. This is obviously very good, but it also solidifies the perception of HyperSpy as an EM library. We've...

+1 for hyperspy-X!

Now seriously. I think that these are all very good points. The main objective of the split is to have a hyperspy core package that people from disparate fields feel...

MatSpy, McSpy, MsSpy?

I agree. `hyperspy-mater` or `hyperspy-matsci` have the advantage of easy discoverability of hyperspy subpackages. However, users will end-up finding a nickname for it. MatSpy is something that people may not...

@ericpre, could you merge Rnm into this?

The issue is that you mixing up ``Signal`` and ``Model`` methods. The best thing would be to go through the [EELS analysis tutorial in the demos](https://github.com/hyperspy/hyperspy-demos/blob/main/electron_microscopy/EELS/EELS_analysis.ipynb) to learn the syntax.

This is a feature that has been requested several times, hence I am sure that it is welcome by many. However, I am not sure that the best way to...

> Nevertheless, having a re-sizeable pointer by default (without having to write one single line of code) will be very handy and convenient. Good point! > The way to properly...

@ericpre, could you merge Rnm into this. Also, wouldn't it be good for consistency to have a resizeable pointer for line spectra too i.e. turning the current line into a...