Fernando Pérez

I like the zmq stages that [@rgbkrk described](https://github.com/jupyter/enhancement-proposals/issues/11#issuecomment-181046207). In this case, acceptance into `draft` status would mean that we're OK with the basic idea to the point of encouraging implementation....

Merci beaucoup, y muchas gracias! Con gusto ayudo a revisar tanto la versión en español comme celle en français :)

As long as @JCEmmons doesn't mind the fact that there may be a bit of work to be re-done for JLab, I'm +1 here. In fact, there may be some...

+1, this is the kind of standardization that wins by more projects adopting. Given we have a crazy number of orgs/projects, we can benefit from this while simultaneously helping it...

Just to confirm, I'm 100% on board with the above. We want to encourage broader participation in fundraising, while organizing a bit our work for better coordination both within Jupyter...

My thought is no - that we should finish fixing any small defaults deviations we might have there (looking at the dpi issue you mentioned) but otherwise let users access...

@ellisonbg sorry, not sure actually: I only noticed a few days ago and since it's with material from a new course, we've been on 3.0.x since the start. So I...

Thx so much for that debugging work @telamonian, much appreciated! I think what we're seeing is that as the tools get more robust (JLab, MathJax, JupyterBook), we're using them in...

As I indicated in #13159, huge, huge ❤️ to @krassowski for this deep-dive into the problem and providing a fix. Many will benefit from these improvements, looking forward to testing...

FWIW, the Classic notebook handles this much more gracefully, as it still opens/saves the notebook, and at least shows on the screen the underlying error message (not very nicely, but...