Alexey

> Would be good to have someone from optimism stack review it too. It's done according to what a learned from @protolambda's answers

Btw the functionality requires a fork and can't merged without it

Let's add quic also, converting to draft

> @flcl42 seems like dotnet is failing with all other implementations. Mind taking a look? The current implementation: - is not compatible with zig and rust via quic-v1 - has...

@thomaseizinger Thanks for the remarks! Right now we are refactoring/fixing the library to fit the tests. I'll also address the suggestions in new update.

@shubham-sonthalia thanks for the interest! Yep, sure. So the examples are similar to ones made for go implementation. Go apps have basic UI like this:  We could try to...

@shubham-sonthalia sorry I totally missed your replies, yep, you can try this lib, looks like it has all controls needed.

> Hey @flcl42, for the solution level, I was previously getting 60 warnings. I have reduced them down to 25 now. But now, I am not sure about the null...

@chertby it's good to have some structure but it seems like complication for potential contributors, another rule to keep in mind. Let's start by having just incremental numbers for the...

@rubo the package has been published to the production feed; docker changes have been rolled back