Flavien DELANGLE
Flavien DELANGLE
> For charts I checked, and I misunderstood it, such that to add additional props, I do it manually instead of using the 3rd generic 🙈 I also forgot at...
> Does types sound good enough? In the pickers and the tree view we use `models` for the endpoint with only types/interfaces. But as you want, we can change in...
> Yeah, models also make sense for types, but given that these are general types, I would prefer types instead. Especially given this package name. 🙈 🤷 Good for me...
I think we should keep both for now, depending on what we decide for #12839, `onItemClick` might not be covered there :+1:
@Cadogantes does this [doc section](https://mui.com/x/react-tree-view/rich-tree-view/items/#get-an-item-by-id) solve your problem? If not, could you describe it more in depth so that we can adress it properly? If it does, I think we...
Hi, The behavior is indeed intended, we are applying logic when the array changes (using a regular `useMemo`), so if the array is mutated, the derived value won't be re-computed....
I'm renaming the issue and adding waiting for upvote to see if this pain point is shared in the community. If so, we will add some warning on the code...
It could be tricky to have good TypeScript support if we introduce these kind of conditionally available props.
> It seems to fix #9653 We need to test it in depth to make sure it does But if it does, I'm in favor of bumping the minimal version...
> Is it fine that any date with a +00:00 offset will internally be handled as a UTC date? 🤔 I have my doubts, but not enough knowledge to know...