Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
Closing as there is not much of value left here.
This wrecks havoc on the macro hell in `TestIO`...
> There's a caveat though if the code is being processed by multiple Cppcheck versions and the finding is no longer reported. This might lead to unexpected `unmatchedSuppression` warnings (which...
This also affects `ubuntu:16:04` (https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/actions/runs/7677304162/job/20926809147?pr=5917) ``` /__e/node20/bin/node: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /__e/node20/bin/node) /__e/node20/bin/node: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.28' not found (required by /__e/node20/bin/node) /__e/node20/bin/node: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found...
Did you use some tooling to detect these or was it a manual review?
No tests added since we still do not have tests for additional files ... but I just realized that certain directories always exists so at least on Linux it can...
> Moving code is problematic though as Cppcheck is GPL and this would re-license it under 0BSD. @danmar After we resolved and merged this we should create another release so...
The helper functions need to be adjusted so they align with the current usage in Cppcheck.
Thanks for your contribution. This change was proposed before - see my previous comments on it here: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/5326#discussion_r1294640814.
I have more comments on this but I am currently having issues with my hands (among other things) making it hard to do any work.