Oliver Stöneberg

> Aren't these rules in the selfcheck already? No, that file is unused. As mentioned in my previous comment we have the `internal` check implemented in source which does similar...

I would also like to profile the impact of the changes first. It should be miniscule but just to be sure. I am not sure if I still get around...

> Who uses the rule file then? I assume `rules` is yet another dumping ground folder with random leftovers, examples and external submissions. I have not checked the history of...

> thanks.. my problem with this is that I don't like the rule files and would rather like to get rid of this old mistake. It's not hard to implement...

> Of course, these rules can always be implemented in addons as well, but as it turned out, addons are much slower because of Python is involved. Performance should be...

> If we could at least get rid of that stupid PCRE dependency that would be a major step forward. #6211 at least tries to encapsulate it so it could...

> I don't know the exact difference of PCRE and C++ regex but I would imagine that it's only different in some edge cases. PCRE is super fast and `std::regex`...

Closing as the file in question has been removed in #6951. IIRC the internal check was also improved to detect this. If there is still something to be improved on,...

I think this might be a known limitation: https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/faq/#why-do-you-require-a-google-account-for-authentication

Given that we have no default standard set and we don't check the standard in any other place the check in `simplecpp::preprocess()` should probably be removed (as well as the...