Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
This should be fine to merge. I will address the case of default to the latest standard if none is provided in a different PR and also file a ticket...
Currently just a hack but tests still pass. And this fixes https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11885.
I am pretty sure the hack is all wrong (too warm to think 🫠). But I think the idea is sound 🤞. Definitely needs way more tests first.
These changes are better. They pass all the tests in simplecpp and Cppcheck. They do not fix that upstream issue as it hits something different now. Before ``` Benchmark 1:...
Unfortunately these changes case a big regression to the example in #96. Before ``` Benchmark 1: ./simplecpp -q file2.c Time (mean ± σ): 1.088 s ± 0.033 s [User: 0.784...
The clang-tidy false negative which was unearthed by this was reported upstream as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64955.
This sounds like an issue I fixed ages ago. I discovered this (among a lot of others) while writing unit tests for `chdman`. Unfortunately those are outside of the tree...
Thanks for your contribution. You also need to install the library in the CI job in `CI-unixish.yml` which runs the test in strict mode. Also the configuration seems to have...
> If we could detect the corresponding headers, we would automatically load the new library in daca (as far as I understand it). Same with the emscripten PR #6503 Those...
> So we should add it, but leave it commented out until 2.15 is released? Yes.