Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
As most users won't see the message we should refrain from actually specifying a target until we are able to actually properly communicate this to the user. I have an...
Still requires some refactoring of `CmdLineParser` and mainly causes issue in the GUI which I have not yet resolved. I removed the CI files so this does not trigger a...
Thanks for the update. I will leave it as a draft for now. It's not blocking anything - I just came across this while review potential `unusedFunction` false negatives.
> A little surprising that it would show up as an unused function since I believe unit tests were added. That's the point. There's a selfcheck in the CI which...
As a fix for the democlient it should possibly perform a delayed call to `Settings::Terminate()` instead which should provide a similar behavior. I am also open to keeping the option...
This approach goes probably a bit too far. I will revise the changes.
Yes, this goes in hand with #5288 and https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11248 as it is about progress indication as well as providing interruption points for cancellation (especially if not using threads instead of...
I will file a ticket about this in the next few days.
Seems there already was a ticket about this: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/3450. I also came to some of the same conclusions before even reading it.
If you add `workflow_dispatch:` to the `on:` entries you could trigger a changed version from a branch manually.