Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
Closing in favor of #6428.
I filed https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11602 for the `symbolDatabaseWarning` selfcheck warnings. These changes also triggered the already fixed https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11535.
Thanks for your contribution. Please add a unit test to `test/cfg/boost.cpp`.
This also needs to be added to the manpage via `man/cppcheck.1.xml`. I am not sure if we should pack this all into the command-line. That should probably go into the...
No idea. I only ever used compilation databases as input. I still have tests sitting in my tree which uses the other inputs for our code base but I only...
Somewhat related: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11824. CC @chrfranke
I think this was mentioned in some ticket discussion. I did not find it anymore.
https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10045 is the meta ticket which already contains some (outdated) data and references.
I am a bit curious that there is just a single complaint about a very common symbol as `std::string::npos`.
``` gui/codeeditorstyle.cpp:125:40: debug: valueflow.cpp:10106:valueFlowConditionExpressions bailout: Skipping function due to incomplete variable widgetFGColor [valueFlowBailoutIncompleteVar] QVariant(defaultStyleLight.widgetFGColor)).value(); ^ ```