Oliver Stöneberg
Oliver Stöneberg
The "issue" we are having is that we are using a single suppression file for multiple different Cppcheck analysis invocations. This causes `unmatchedSuppression` warnings for unmatched global suppressions and suppressions...
As most (all) of the issues are with having a suppression file and those do not apply to inline suppression at all maybe we should introduce `unmatchedInlineSuppression`?
Same issue using `xrdp-0.10.0_beta.3-1` AUR package. Will dig into the linked resources later.
It is a bit of a mess right now and discussions are ongoing about this. `--check-level=normal` disables a whole part of ValueFlow which saw a massive performance regression in 2.14....
Also please CC me on any future Cppcheck-related things.
> Get #3024 sorted out first, then see if you can reproduce this one when you've got a working desktop. The desktop is actually working fine except for the file...
I think we still have a misunderstanding. The issue happens if I try to copy+paste a file (not text) *within* the remote desktop. I do *not* try to move any...
I can still squash this if desired.
On a side note: IMO the variable prefix `g_` should only be used for actual global variables (i.e. used in multiple TUs). If they are simply local and available in...
I added `CPPFLAGS="-Wmissing-prototypes"` to the `configure` call to produce these warnings. If you want to integrate this properly and portable you need to add a check to the autoconf process...