Finn-Ole Carstens

@sbastrakov's idea sounds good.I will try to add an assertion and add a comment to the param files. The same should happen if you just detect in a single azimuth...

I think I'll do it without an assert and just program border cases, if `nPhi` or `nTheta` are equal to one, so that it'll automatically use `phiMin` and `thetaMin` as...

Yes, I couldn't create NaNs with #3105 and the default LWFA setup and a gammafilter which is equal to `filterGamma = 1.0`. This means it should also have considered stationary...

It's been a while since I used this plugin and I don't really remember this error... But from what I gathered by reading through all the messages here, this error...

> For the transition radiation plugin however, there is no time integration, and (as far as I understand it) the filter is the standard instantaneous filter used e.g. also for...

> @PrometheusPi How many GPUs @finnolec is using. I am wondering if the not-so-dense areas are full GPUs. My cfg setup is: ``` TBG_devices_x=2 TBG_devices_y=16 TBG_devices_z=4 ``` So I'm using...

> @finnolec would it be possible to rerun one of the affected simulations but with particle output enabled? I just restarted the simulation. I will send you the output path...

I tried to run the simulations with field + particle output but the simulation crashed because the buffer size for my openPMD output was too small... Currently I don't really...

> @BeyondEspresso can we close this PR or is this still relevant? We have the new feature incident fields where we can define laser from all sides too. see: #3592...

I'm currently busy with different things, I will look into this PR in February again. I guess, you can wait until then with testing.