Bill Fenner

> seems like above one is not compression. it is the syntax defined by RFC https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3397#section-3 That RFC refers to RFC 1035 section 4.1.4, "Message compression".

I've had other changes where I rebased regularly, which turned out to be a wasted effort. Are you saying that if I rebase this now, someone will look at it?

> I can spend up to a day on proofreading your implementation if you rebase now. Thanks. I've rebased, tidied up some minor details, and made sure the tests pass....

There are two main changes: 1. for DHCP option 119, loop over the option calling fqdn_print2() until we have processed the entire option. This corresponds to this section of RFC3397:...

The direct link to Coveralls is https://coveralls.io/github/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump Thanks! Bill On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 5:40 PM Denis Ovsienko wrote: > I had restarted the Travis job and Coverall is...

> This integration should be simpler in Cirrus CI with Coveralls-specific steps in a task of their own like Coverity Scan. Do you need my help porting it? I'll check...

I've gotten it to do ... something ... from cirrus-ci - the result is at https://coveralls.io/jobs/97271148 The job said it was pending on coveralls, even after cirrus-ci completed, and manually...

Can you assume that a live capture is host endian, and then use `pcap_is_swapped()` to decide to swap fields when reading from a capture file? (Obviously some infrastructure would have...

Naively, since we're only setting the callback when using -w, can't this be implemented in `dump_packet()` instead? If enough time has passed, then call `print_packets_captured()`, and don't set the itimer...

I naively suggested: > Naively, ... can't this be implemented in `dump_packet()` instead? Obviously there's a significant difference in that, if you get 1000 packets in the first 0.9 seconds,...