Fabien Potencier
Fabien Potencier
Closing as there is no more activities and the current code cannot be merged as is. Feel free to reopen.
@Zuruuh What's the status of this PR?
I can argue that it's well named as it gets the operators from the extension.
I suppose we're looking for a performance improvement here. Have you tried to measure it because I'm wondering if we could do something like this instead to simplify the code...
#3737 has been merged now.
If these functions already exist, I suppose that this should be fixed instead of hiding the problem by checking for existence (which would not guarantee that the implementation is the...
I understand your (unusual) setup. But this is not something that we will support for the reason explained above.
Fixed by #4216
I suppose that this is a precedence problem.