Fabrizio Ferrai

@JordanMartinez we should add a test to verify this

@CharlesTaylor7 would you still like to have a look at this one or should it be marked as up for grabs?

We necessarily have to use the local compiler to ensure that the package can indeed compile before submitting it to the registry (the registry pipeline will try to compile it,...

@flip111 that should be fixed by #1046 once it's released

@thomashoneyman would it make sense if the compiler had its own Nix scaffolding so we wouldn't have to update an extra repo? (we'd still need to update the Registry CI)

> I also doubt the compiler team wants to support a Nix build The core team and the compiler team have very much overlap, so I'd say that if the...

This goes together with #1056

1. this is a good suggestion 2. SPDX does not have a field for "any license", and we're not going to support it. The PureScript Registry is only going to...

It's still a big project - see [this big thing made by GitHub](https://github.com/licensee/licensee) that does exactly this

Sure, I'd be willing to merge a PR that implements this if it's only a few lines of code