Fabrizio Ferrai

Hi, I just hit this bug - using [this grammar](https://github.com/dhall-lang/dhall-lang/blob/master/standard/dhall.abnf), that also assumes that alternatives are considered left-to-right. (the grammar is quite complex so I won't explain where the problem...

Hi! I usually hang out more in [PureScript land](https://github.com/purescript/purescript) than here, but Veit got my attention on this PR, so I'll leave a few throughts (of course feel free to...

I just got into the same issue: I too have a subscription `:magical-value` that is derived in some non-trivial way from the app-db, and I need it as an input...

@IsaacKhor is was looking as specter lately too, and indeed it would be help in refactoring out a "data accessing layer" common to both subs and handlers. With "generalised data...

A few more notes: - I noticed there are already some specs already for schema creation and config, and I intend to reuse them, but I feel we should still...

> Should this be a draft PR for now? @hellerve I forgot to make it a draft at first and now it looks like I cannot convert it to draft...

> Is this the form of spec'ing you would also have expected for the client? Right, I wanted to add a note about this: the specs I'm adding are Clojure...

@kordano great news! Do you think I should wait for the test refactoring before moving forward with this? It might be actually necessary if we don't want to spec these...

This is now ready for review! I feel like I'm fairly happy with where I got here, and tests are now passing locally. (I suspect CI should run, but I...

I'd consider this a bug, but not sure we should handle it in the standard. Most likely yes though, as all implementations will have to care about this.