Yves Brissaud

Thanks for reporting my old issue :-) See #66 for the PR.

Thank you @christophbrejla for raising the issue. This has been fixed and will be part of the next release.

HI @gustavovalverde Very interesting point. Right now that can't work that way. Basically the condition is based on the comparison between the two images. But the 3 other commands are...

Thanks @jessfraz for the report. I'm able to reproduce it, looking at it and will keep you posted once fixed.

@jessfraz It looks like the organisation you're using is not enrolled to docker scout and that causes the issue. As it's not enrolled we can't get specific data based on...

cc @vikram-dagger the comments added to the `pom.xml` file are related to https://github.com/dagger/dagger/pull/9663#discussion_r1965513404 in order to make it clearer some parts should not be modified.

Hi 👋 This folder is only about temporary files, so files should be automatically removed once handled. Question to better understand how it happens: did you used the `docker scout`...

Ok, that's definitely unexpected. A few other questions if you don't mind, just to better understand your use case and target the issue. What type of image is it? Is...

Hi @rwaffen Thanks for reporting the issue. Yes you're right, currently it will overwrite the existing comment. You can try by setting `keep-previous-comments: true` (see https://github.com/docker/scout-action?tab=readme-ov-file#pull-request-comments) so it will add...

I'll do that 👍 Currently it's not ready, I'm working on it. Basically it needs #9767 I opened (it's in draft) earlier today, and that's the first step to #9194...