Erwin Kok
Erwin Kok
@mxinden I just created a draft pull request, I just want to test first before its ready for review. Testing locally works, in GitHub actions not sure yet. Is it...
Thanks @mxinden ! I missed that one. Just added it and pushed.
@mxinden The build failed because the versionFolder (line 21 versions.ts) does not expect the patch version. I dropped the patch version in the latest commit.
> I like the approach you are taking here, namely to integrate your new implementation into the interop test-suite early on. To be honest, I wasn't aware of the test-plans...
@mxinden There is still one issue left for me to solve the interoperability test. And unfortunately, I didn't have much time to work on it, until now... I tried to...
> > I tried to reproduce it locally, and it **seems** that the problem is that the rust implementation requests (and waits) for an identify stream ("/ipfs/id/1.0.0") before requesting the...
> > to see which protocols are requested. > > Perhaps there is a misunderstanding here but libp2p does not have a notion of _requesting_ protocols. Instead, nodes _offer_ certain...
> > > The rust-libp2p interop test binary will attempt to open a stream with the identify protocol to you. We had to add that because there is / was(?)...
> > > > The rust-libp2p interop test binary will attempt to open a stream with the identify protocol to you. We had to add that because there is /...
> > Do you expect when an implementation does not support a protocol, it resets the stream immediately? > > It should not reset the stream. The initiator might still...