Emily Riederer
Emily Riederer
Per discussion [here](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/645#issuecomment-2532191271), we're moving this to "hold" state while `Capybara` proceeds
Thanks @adamhsparks ! It looks like `{covr}` also has options to explicitly exclude certain functions from code coverage calculations ([details here](https://covr.r-lib.org/reference/exclusions.html)). Would it make sense to use that logic just...
Thanks, @adamhsparks ! That sounds like a great suggestion. I'll hold if you want to investigate including sample data or using @mpadge 's idea. If those prove intractable, I'm also...
Sounds good, @adamhsparks ! Happy holidays!
Hi @HzaCode -- happy to be taking this on! You are correct that the next steps are on me here. I will conduct my review and begin to look for...
@ropensci-review-bot check package
Hi @HzaCode -- a few notes/questions before we proceed: - I see the packages imports `XML` which is obsolete. Our [recommended scaffolding](https://devguide.ropensci.org/pkg_building.html#recommended-scaffolding) suggests `xml2` as an alternative (more details at...
@ropensci-review-bot check package
Hi @HzaCode -- when you have time, please let me know what you think of my comments [above](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/728#issuecomment-3568645023). Particularly, if you are interested in implementing the bullets about the `XML`...
@ropensci-review-bot check package