Emily Riederer
Emily Riederer
@ropensci-review-bot assign @AleKoure as reviewer
@ropensci-review-bot assign @jonclayden as reviewer
@rmgpanw -- Thank you for the explanation! My apologies, that's my oversight. That's good as-is.
@rmgpanw -- I'm happy to introduce our two reviewers @jonclayden and @AleKoure. Both have backgrounds in API extraction and healthcare, so I'm grateful to bring their expertise into the review...
@ropensci-review-bot check package
@ropensci-review-bot check package
Hey @pachadotdev ! This seems like some very cool software and an important goal. Could you please elaborate on how you see this package interacting with the `redatamx` package you...
Hi @pachadotdev - thanks for your patience as we discussed internally. This looks like a great project that is undoubtedly extremely useful and well within the rOpenSci scope. However, we...
Thanks @pachadotdev for the replies. Just to clarify: I understand that you and @litalbaraki have established a good working model that sounds very effective for your purpose. I understand the...
Hi @pachadotdev ! Thanks for the update. We do review submissions on branches, but that case assumes that packages post-review will ultimately be hosted on the default GitHub branch as...