eliottrosenberg
eliottrosenberg
@maffoo Should I start a pull request where I delete those checks?
That sounds good to me! I did not realize that `qcs_objects` already has `device` and `sampler` attributes. That's really convenient but wasn't explained in the quickstart.
Actually, could we modify `get_qcs_objects_for_notebook` to take a `run_name` and `device_config_name` as optional inputs? That way its sampler attribute could already be the one that the user will use.
This should probably go in a separate PR, but I think the next step after this is to write a transformer that replaces the two-qubit gates in a circuit with...
> @eliottrosenberg I don't know if this is enough or not. how do you think we should modify the notebooks? I think this is basically sufficient. I added a few...
Resolved by https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/pull/5919.
@dstrain115 @mhucka maybe you can take a look at this. Thanks! Thanks @snichet for noticing this!
@mhucka happy to provide more context if you want, but it seems that @ddddddanni has it covered!
@ddddddanni ah, I missed that I can do `.calibration_result.filtered_bitstrings` and `.calibration_result.calibration_result.filtered_bitstrings`. That's great! Thanks!