Elijah ben Izzy
Elijah ben Izzy
See https://github.com/DAGWorks-Inc/burr/pull/444 for a quick fix -- will be digging in more. Good find @zilto!
This should be as simple as throwing the appropriate error message [here](https://github.com/DAGWorks-Inc/burr/blob/bf00101d8440e79d0de0c726d4580d58e232f6b3/burr/integrations/pydantic.py#L116)
> here Yep, I think that will work. In fact, you don't have to have the `None` there, you can just do `.get(...)` which returns `None` if it's not there!
> Hey @elijahbenizzy @zilto can anyone of you give me feedback on the `if` condition? Hey! Looks good at first glance. Open a PR and add some tests, then I...
Yep, this is clean. `OneToMany` -> `Select` maybe? Current transition = if/else `Select` = switch statement
So I think the switch statement is nice as a concept, but I'd decouple it from the LLM stuff. A few things in the example above: 1. burying the heavy-lifting...
> please assign this issue to me! Assigned, thank you!
See this claude chat to get started! https://claude.site/artifacts/502ab996-3352-4809-bd35-4a3493e1583d
> > > what filters would you want if any on this? > > > I would imagine it being very integral with the state, maybe something like how a...
> Re Edge cases -- 1., 3. are ok! > > For 2.,4.,5. -- we could add the flag `allow_experimental_mode`. Then we have one version that offers basic, limited and...