Eli Bendersky

@jkutner while in general we're interested in new portable services, there are caveats that make it impossible to commit to things right now. First, it's unclear what the demand for...

I've closed #371 3.9 sounds good I'm ok with accepting types, but it would be great if this could be done gradually

> [@eliben](https://github.com/eliben) > > This is primarily for the public facing API, right? Theoretically, wherever it'd be helpful, I suppose. But the public facing API would be a priority, of...

> How do you want me to handle 🐛 like this in [`elftools/elf/descriptions.py`:250](https://github.com/eliben/pyelftools/blob/main/elftools/elf/descriptions.py#L250): > > def describe_attr_tag_arm(…): > d_entry = … > if d_entry is None: > … > return...

It sounds like an underlying API issue, not something specific to the Go SDK It's worth asking on https://discuss.ai.google.dev/

> > The switch should be positive (enable cache, not skip cache), there should be much more comments and there should be tests. > > Do you mean that caches...

@sevaa LGTM Is this LGTY? Can you use the code review tool here to LGTM PRs?

@mrothroc could you try to specify a single tool with a list of your functions? A tool (https://pkg.go.dev/cloud.google.com/go/vertexai/genai#Tool) has a list of function decls you can specify

Thanks for checking. I've labeled the issue `aiplatform` to indicate it's the underlying API that has the issue - it's not SDK specific.

> I wonder if llms is the right place to put the errors, I don't love the new source dependency on what is already a pretty large package implies. I...