Eileen

> would Rails ever consider a public API for accessing this model or table name? I'd be fine with `schema_migration` being public but not the class. When I removed the...

> did you get some time to redesign parts of ActiveRecord? This isn't a one month project, it's probably 6mo to a year. I haven't been able to merge the...

Hi @grobie I actually found a solution for this that doesn't require me to refactor a ton of active record code. Since it is a slight behavior change I don't...

But my change doesn't make your problem worse @grobie, it just chooses a different default shard if that's what you've defined. The bug I fixed was the original reported bug...

> In Rails 7.1 will this solution work or will it be replaced with the first shard entry, ignoring this setting? First shard entry will win so you should make...

Can someone do the backport PR? It doesn't cherry-pick cleanly and I don't have the bandwidth to fight conflicts right now. Thanks!

hey @Edouard-chin I saw that you mentioned you saw this one on the other issue so I assigned this to you too. Let us know if you need more information.

cc/ @nvasilevski can you take a look at this?

> It also makes every Rails upgrade as complicated on our side. Just a note about your patch. It's using entirely private APIs which we can change or remove without...

Hi @krebbl there's not enough information here for us to determine what's wrong. We don't have the bandwidth for application support and haven't received any other reports of behavior like...