Eric Helms
Eric Helms
@Griffin-Sullivan @evgeni ok with this change or do you feel we should wait?
@sjha4 I will get to checking this early this week.
Can you give me some clarity here that I am missing to consider this further: a) Does this issue only affect the host Foreman + Katello itself is running on?...
I am trying to understand why the default port needs to be changed to decide how to address this in Katello. To understand if this is simply a breakage accessing...
Example output: ``` Running preparation steps required to run the next scenarios ================================================================================ Check whether system has any non Red Hat repositories (e.g.: EPEL) enabled: | Checking repositories enabled on...
Currently contains https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_maintain/pull/793 to get a single Packit build with both for further data gathering.
I think this is a good change, https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_maintain/pull/705 means we won't have to make it in but a few extra places.
This is being addressed through various changes, in large, culminating through https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_maintain/pull/879
I've added a Redmine and taken this out of draft. The idea is to move to explicitly stating the steps for each upgrade scenario for each phase rather than relying...
@evgeni @Griffin-Sullivan Take a look, this is now rebased on the consolidation of the scenario to a single file