Chris Markiewicz

I'm going to punt on drafting text here, as I think we might want a little experimentation with validating overrides before we commit to language that locks us into something.

HED is schema-defined and the validator as written will ignore any attempts to override it. It will currently warn that it's ignoring the override, but it does make sense to...

Reading https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/issues/1165#issuecomment-1549699835 and the following discussion, I think the overall consensus was toward permissiveness; i.e., allow in any label instead of splitting out a new multi-label concept. I feel like...

This would be a difficult one to write schema rules for. We would need to have some notion of collections of files and collating metadata in a useful way. More...

Ah, that is https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-validator/issues/79.

> > The BIDSVersion field of 'dataset_description.json' does not match a known release. > > The BIDS Schema used for validation may be out of date. > > If the...

Testing your updated schema in bids-standard/bids-specification#1864 and the latest validator (`master` branch): Output ```console ❯ BIDS_SCHEMA=file:///$HOME/Projects/bids/specification/src/schema.json deno run -A https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-validator/raw/master/bids-validator/src/bids-validator.ts --ignoreNiftiHeaders dwi_deriv [WARNING] The BIDSVersion field of 'dataset_description.json' does not...

I reread the BIDS and DICOM sections, and it looks like the inconsistency is internal to BIDS, not between the two specs: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/issues/1906 I'm removing the `SLICE_TIMING_AND_DURATION_MUTUALLY_EXCLUSIVE` check, since a...

Sorry, I thought I had responded to this, but it was probably in some tab that got closed. When traits 6.4 came out, we saw many more than 1 test...

IMO links are less useful in a PDF, so if this only affects the HTML spec, that seems fine.