Eric Erhardt
Eric Erhardt
> Shouldn’t we be exposing the cdk type? What does this mean, specifically? We have a ConfigureInfrastructure on the Sql server resource, where you can get the child cdk objects...
> This means we can't just expose a SqlSku property as @davidfowl is asking. We can however expose WithFreeOffer() but since we want this to be the default I don't...
> Is that correct, and all agree that this is the way to go? That seems to be the best approach to me.
These changes shouldn't be made in main. Closing
> The third one is running into some weird test failures, I'm not sure we want to go there. Doesn't look to help much extra for webapiaot size so I'd...
@JasonLunn @YarinOmesi - it looks like https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/19667 caused this regression with native AOT. Is there any way this PR could get merged to unblock the AOT issue?
@JasonLunn - What is the process for getting this change merged? Are there C# owners/contributors in this project that could review and get the change merged?
I think this is now fixed. The HealthChecks packages all reference the Azure.{area}.{service} packages now. Is there more work remaining here?
@james-gould - check out https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/compatibility for how we thinking breaking changes/compatibility. The change you are proposing is what we call a "Binary breaking change". If a library is already built...
@EricJohnson327 - any thoughts here?