Eddie Knight

If anyone has further suggestions or nitpicks, please add them as comments here. I'll work on creating a PR (or PRs) to address these suggestions next week.

This issue will be resolved during the EKS child-module breakout.

- [x] Create repos for child modules as needed, using template repo as base - [x] Next module to work is here: https://github.com/finos/compliant-financial-infrastructure/tree/dev/accelerators/kubernetes/eks/tf_cdmc_aws_eks

@abdullahgarcia @thinkl33t Can we go ahead and merge PR #224? I think that will resolve @AdrianHammond's question here and let the team move forward with this issue

> Yeah there's one more typofix in there, once thats done we can merge :) @thinkl33t Oh dang. I'm not seeing any more comments on there... what am I overlooking?

> Apparently the review was still 'pending' and i couldn't finalize it from github mobile :facepalm: GitHub mobile is kicking my butt today as well. I went to quote Adrian's...

A potential next step for this issue would be to extract the current EKS terraform configs to a standalone repository. A placeholder repo exists here: https://github.com/finos/terraform-aws-eks_cdmc The existing CICD pipelines...

Closing as a duplicate of #239.

@mcleo-d - is there a high demand for the BDD element to tests? I'm currently working on a solution proposal that will have decreased maintenance and contribution overhead compared to...

Thanks for the heads up! I will continue working on the lightweight (non BDD) alternative to Probr so we can explore it as an option once the validation WG is...