ThomasV
ThomasV
> I think the two hard parts are the watchtower and channel backups in the case of public servers. I agree, and I am not proposing a solution to that....
Note: two important proposals have been posted to the #lightning-dev mailing list since I opened this issue, that propose a solution to the problem of channels backups, by making it...
Following-up on my initial post: release 4.1.0 will have trampoline routing, and on-chain static backups using an `op_return` (#7112). This solves two of the issues posted above, at least for...
At this point there is no evidence that a new name is needed. Most users of ElectrumX use it for Bitcoin, and they use that name in association with Bitcoin....
similar to #6841 json exports should have a type field
> But I agree that if its expected that the Electrum Lightning implementation wouldn't normally subscribe to spent outpoints, then it could be good enough for now. You cannot expect...
@shsmith thanks for that insight. does it also explain #4058 ?
not sure why `create_invoice` is async.
thanks! indeed, it would be nice to remove `requests`. we had that dependency earlier, and it took us quite some effort to get rid of it.