ThomasV

Results 175 comments of ThomasV

Thanks for the clarification. Keep in mind that the main UX reason to support non-initiator channels is to let users receive LN payments on startup, when their wallet does not...

this does not require any modification of the software. you can trivially do it yourself by "restoring" with your own seed.

version 2.0 will no longer create wallets with malformed seeds. However, it will probably not let users use any random string

I think that in `mpp_split`, `suggest_splits` returns configurations that violate in flight limits. I guess `suggest_splits` should call `channel.can_pay()`

Note that the Electrum Version is "dirty", meaning that the code was modified by the user. @janajolovic any chance that bug report comes from you? (I searched for bitcoin users...

it is really difficult for me to imagine that a user would have compiled his own APK after corrupting that line of the code. there must be a deeper issue...

not yet. this is definitely something we want to do, but I'm afraid it is not going to happen soon, unless someone volunteers to do it.

This is because you recently upgraded bitstring; the latest version is incompatibe with Electrum. To fix this, we have removed bitstring from our dependencies, see #9020 If you want to...