Dusty Mabe
Dusty Mabe
> If you're integrating with the host, it should be more like package layering. Is there a reason you're not using that? I think that is the goal longer term,...
I've got workarounds for this for now, so it is not a high priority.
> 1. Recommend against using `storage.files` to create systemd units. Just stick with `systemd.units`. yeah, the reason I ended up here was because of https://github.com/coreos/ignition/issues/586.
> I'm not opposed to this but...an entirely different approach would be for us to support merging in libostree branches. Something like: Does what you describe above have any overlap...
@Marcel-Lambacher - any chance you are working on implementing this?
any reason we have the `hold` label on this?
In my mind I had cross linked this ticket back here when I opened it, but in practice that didn't happen. See - https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-pipeline/issues/900
@jlebon bump The RHCOS and FCOS share the same pipeline code now.
> To confirm, did you verify that this passes on RHCOS? tested on `rhcos-416.94.202404301731-0-live.x86_64.iso`: ``` Running test: iso-offline-install-iscsi.ibft.bios PASS: iso-offline-install-iscsi.ibft.bios (3m23.07s) Running test: iso-offline-install-iscsi.manual.bios PASS: iso-offline-install-iscsi.manual.bios (3m15.665s) ```