dundargoc
dundargoc
Duplicate of https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/24563?
> Also of note is that we'd need to include luals in make lint Strongly against this. Right now we have no "caching" of luals, meaning that if we change...
But that was intended though. You can't just revert a change and assume it's fine, you need to do the work of understanding why the change was made in the...
Should be available on v0.11. I suppose we could backport it since it's arguably a fix?
Should be available in the next release after that PR is merged.
I dislike templates like this, but right now this is *fine*. A problem I've noticed is that these things tend to grow (to try to catch more and more problems),...
You'd think an optimizing compiler would easily figure out low-hanging optimizations like this automatically. Not that I'm against this change per se, but I would personally be more comfortable with...
> For example: https://github.com/IAKOBVS/neovim-inline-demo You didn't enable LTO which should take care of that. I'm not sure if it does though, I can test at home. In any case: while...
Since we don't actually test/run any of the lua configs in CI to my knowledge, the best we can hope for is to make a string search of changed lines...
I'm not really a fan of the suggested deprecation strategy. It creates extra CI work and makes the process harder because we now need to have bookkeeping of which util...