Deepti Gandluri

I'm also in favor of a unified process, and wouldn't have objections to using the meetings repo. My one concern with using the meetings repo is all the additional notifications...

> This seems very reasonable and useful to me as an exit criterion for phase 1. Would we just require that scope/goals/requirements are documented and leave it to the CG...

> To clarify, are you suggesting 4x4hr slots? That is my current suggestion, inspired by TC39, and other previously in-person events. This is very tentative at this point, so depending...

Thanks for the feedback! If shorter zoom sessions would be more workable there are a couple of things we could try - 1. A Wasm CG week with 2-Hr meetings...

We discussed this in the [6/22/21 meeting](https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/main/2021/CG-06-22.md), though the meeting notes aren't very verbose. What I remember matches @syg's comment above that as this is an integration feature, we do...

I'd like some input on the usage patterns of this API in the tools. One of the [motivations](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-resizablearraybuffer#sync-up-capability-with-webassembly-memorygrow) of the ResizableArrayBuffer proposal is to expose memory.grow to JS without having...

@Ms2ger Friendly ping for a review.

I also remember this to be the case, though I don't think it is documented anywhere except in the [meeting notes](https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/8f06ff4d8c1f8af28a37fd1f2ab4b7df30741f76/main/2017/CG-05.md) when it was discussed. Edit: The exact wording on...

I've added a quick agenda item for the next meeting at https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/pull/1087. I'd also like to add some explicit polls there, so bringing this back for discussion. Would it make...

I agree with @tlively about the ergonomic loss of not having the unsigned conversions, and it would be interesting to see what the exact application usage is. This case is...