Deepti Gandluri

Results 118 comments of Deepti Gandluri

Thanks @aheejin and @yuri91. @conrad-watt Sorry about the permissions issue, should be fixed now.

@aardappel Permissions should be fixed now. The official instructions on how to rename are [here](https://github.com/github/renaming). @penzn This also automatically updates open PRs, the only thing this would not update are...

Repositories are merged and archived, so those weren't updated: - [bulk-memory-operations](https://github.com/WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations) - [conditional-sections](https://github.com/WebAssembly/conditional-sections) - [multi-value](https://github.com/WebAssembly/multi-value) - [JS-BigInt-integration](https://github.com/WebAssembly/JS-BigInt-integration) - [mutable-global](https://github.com/WebAssembly/mutable-global) - [reference-types](https://github.com/WebAssembly/reference-types) - [sign-extension-ops](https://github.com/WebAssembly/sign-extension-ops) - [lld](https://github.com/WebAssembly/lld) - [wasm-jit-prototype](https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasm-jit-prototype) - [workloads](https://github.com/WebAssembly/workloads) Repositories...

As the engine is responsible for code generation, the engine can decide what the most optimal code generation path is. We're still working through some alignment issues in the V8...

> > If the alignment hint says that the pointer may be unaligned, then we emit byte loads and stores instead of potentially unaligned word loads and stores. > >...

I've opened https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/issues/857 to gather ideas on how we can streamline the process, based on responses there, I can add to the process documentation if we decide that there is...

Thanks @penzn and @MaxGraey this sounds like a good start, I'll transfer this issue to the design repository as it is out of scope for relaxed-simd. Please note that a...

> @MaxGraey It works well in Firefox, but in Chrome, I am getting a following error in the latest Google Chrome: > > ``` > Uncaught (in promise) RangeError: WebAssembly.Instance...

> I really like this proposal and I am glad it is happening now! 👍 > > One additional use case I can think of is to implement the equivalent...

> Exciting! > > > `memory.map`: Provide the functionality of `mmap(addr, length, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED, fd)` on POSIX, and `MapViewOfFile` on Windows with access `FILE_MAP_READ`/`FILE_MAP_WRITE`. > > What are you imagining...