David Tippett

"as they were deemed nicer" - while I appreciate that several of them might look nicer however I want to ask are they explicitly brand compliant? If not then are...

@calebcartwright as I see it the only reason that people want to keep the ones here is because the other ones aren't brand compliant, so it is part of the...

@AlexandreODelisle I think it would be really problematic to implement this with how GitHub rate limits. It would probably just be easier to offload the results to a queue on...

I think part of the issue has to do with the paged function. The client.search.code endpoint returns the following as a body: ``` { "total_count": 0, "incomplete_results": False, "items": []...

For anyone that runs into this here is a working pagination function that can replace the current one. ```python def paginator(operation, per_page=30, page=1, **kwargs): """Helper function for paginating requests Parameters:...

Hey @tetienne check out my issue #96. I had the same issue with search.code. I have a function that should work for pagination there. The issue is GitHub sends back...

> will these changes be merged into master? Curious about this as well. Seems to automatically detect if there are multiple masters so I don't see why it couldn't be...

@ticheng-aws sorry for the delay I’ll get these changes in.

@thanawan-atc should we not go to 2.0.3 since it's the latest in that line?

Also, do you think we should change the requirements.txt to be