Don Syme
Don Syme
@yazeedobaid Sounds good! please go with that!
Sounds good. I'd love it if we could just simplify the CSS as well, so it looks good but there's nothing unnecessary in it
https://fslab.org/docs-template/ looks great. We really do have to support .ipynb inputs as well, it would make it perfect
Hmmm interesting. I think you'd just need to debug through what's happening in `GetNavigationEntries`, I see let link = model.Uri(root) and `root` should come from `Crack.crackProjects` and is used throughout,...
@artempyanykh Yes, makes sense - please do submit a PR to make the ranges non-optional
@cartermp this was the main reason I had hoped to use a root URL of either docs.fsharp.org/FSharp.Core or fsharp.github.io/docs/FSharp.Core Both potentially feel long term canonical for inward links, even if...
@cartermp How do you feel about this? I'd really love to be able to generate links into FSHarp.Core docs, but we need stable long term URLs for that. It it...
@cartermp What would be the process to get `docs.fsharp.org/FSharp.Core`? I'm still tempted by fsharp.github.io/docs/FSharp.Core since it is still pretty canonical by industry standards
@baronfel I think we'd just have to rename `fsharp-core-docs` repo to `docs` and generate a"FSharp.Core" prefix Since the current name maps to fsharp.github.io/fsharp-core-docs
This one is annoyingly hard to fix because code sections are formatted to HTML earlier than for other outputs, I'm not sure why